It is expected that Jonathan Niese will eventually get another shot in the big leagues this season. But has Brad Holt jumped him as the Mets best pitching prospect?

Toby Hyde of SNY’s Mets Minor League Blog ranked Holt as the Mets #3 prospect behind Fernando Martinez and Wilmer Flores; Niese is #4. Baseball America, one of the most recognized authorities on prospects, ranked Niese above Holt.

I’m going to have to side with Hyde on this one. Niese is a nice prospect, but Holt has higher upside, better stuff and has experienced more minor league success.

Holt dominated the New York- Penn League last season, recording an ERA of 1.87 in 72.1 innings pitched, with a whopping 96 strikeouts and 33 walks.

In Advanced Single-A this season, he had a rough go of it early (one terrible start elevated his ERA). But Holt hit his stride and lowered his ERA to 3.07, with 50 strikeouts and 10 walks in 41.1 innings pitched, or 1.19 ERA, 45 Ks and 6 BB in 37 IP since his first start (hat tip to Not4Nuttin). Holt was recently promoted to AA where he has only had one start.

If John Maine and Oliver Perez can come back healthy and pitch effectively, there may not be a need at starting pitcher, especially if Fernando Nieve and Livan Hernandez continue to pitch well.

But if Holt is nearly as successful in AA as he was in A, perhaps the Mets will look to call him up late in the season; if not as a starter, then out of the bullpen a la Bobby Parnell last season.

The big knock on Holt is that his secondary pitches are unrefined compared to his great fastball. But since relievers don’t need to employ as many different pitches as starters, he may be used effectively as a reliever for the Mets in September while he continues to develop his secondary pitches.

The Mets have been known to move their young prospects aggressively through the minors, and they have called players up from AA to the majors before. Holt is only 22, but so was Jonathan Niese when he was called up last season. It will all depend on how he fares against an improved quality of hitters in AA.

With the way Jerry Manuel has overworked the bullpen lately, relief pitching has become yet another question mark (which could have been negated if they had just hung on to Darren O’Day, who has blossomed into one of the AL’s best relievers…just saying…). If J.J. Putz and Billy Wagner return effectively, the Mets bullpen could again be dominant. But as we saw last year, you can never have too many quality arms.

Right now, Holt is out of action with an ankle injury, but the future looks bright for this supplemental 1st round pick. Perhaps we’ll get a sneak peak of the future in the Mets bullpen this September.

  • Holt's not a small kid -- 6'4 -- so he has the body for a buffed fastball. For a 22 year old kid, Holt's stuff is impressive. Frankly I was impressive with his mechanics when I saw him pitch for Wilmington and one can't deny that his fastball has potential to be a sweeping force in the major leagues. I'm a big proponent of using home grown players as opposed to trading them off -- look at the fanbase Wright and Reyes have compared to Delgado and Beltran.
  • Mugguy
    Holt sounded good as I read your piece to begin with. But then I came to the part about his injury and realized he will fit right in NOW! Bring him up.
  • attolinotimmy
    Holt is pretty impressive and niese is struggling right now so i would say holt is better at the moment
  • Not4Nuttin
    Niese has now made 3 consecutive very strong starts, so looks like he turned the corner a bit. Also remember that and advanced prospect like Niese should be working on things in the minors like secondary pitches, that do not translate into good stats, but hopefully make him a better MLB player. So cannot always rely on the stats.

    That being said, I am with Toby on this one, and have had Holt as our top pitching prospect since late last season. Not to knock Niese, but I think Holt has more upside and is more likely to fulfill it.
  • Not4Nuttin
    You wrote that: "In Advanced Single-A this season, he had a rough go of it early. But Holt hit his stride and lowered his ERA to 3.07, with 50 strikeouts and 10 walks in 41.1 innings pitched." This may sound like a nit-pick, but that statement leaves the reader with the impression that it took a few games before Holt started pitching well. This is just not accurate. He had a lousy first game, but after that, he was lights out, for a line (excluding the first game) of 4-0, 1.19 ERA, 37 IP, 26 hits, 45 Ks and 5 BBs at A+. Game by game:

    IP H ER BB SO
    3.2 7 9 4 5
    6 4 0 1 7
    4 4 1 0 4
    5 4 2 1 4
    6 2 0 2 5
    4.2 5 1 0 9
    6 4 1 1 10
    6 3 0 1 6
  • Not4Nuttin
    one typo - 6 BBs, not 5 BBs, sorry.
  • Rich Resch
    You're right, Not4Nuttin, that language is ambiguous. He has been ridiculously dominant in A Ball besides that first start this season.
  • Rich,

    Thanks for the link.

    Toby
blog comments powered by Disqus