<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Heilman?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hotfootblog.com/2008/08/05/why-heilman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hotfootblog.com/2008/08/05/why-heilman/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: My Case for Heilman</title>
		<link>http://www.hotfootblog.com/2008/08/05/why-heilman/#comment-1784</link>
		<dc:creator>My Case for Heilman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotfootblog.com/?p=7041#comment-1784</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m probably the last guy left that does, but somehow and for some reason I believe in Aaron Heilman and I&#8217;ll try to defend him here.  For some Heilman hate, read Rob Harding&#8217;s piece here on Hot Foot.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m probably the last guy left that does, but somehow and for some reason I believe in Aaron Heilman and I&#8217;ll try to defend him here.  For some Heilman hate, read Rob Harding&#8217;s piece here on Hot Foot.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loran16</title>
		<link>http://www.hotfootblog.com/2008/08/05/why-heilman/#comment-1783</link>
		<dc:creator>loran16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotfootblog.com/?p=7041#comment-1783</guid>
		<description>Ugh.  I really really really hate that reasoning gary, cuz it's retarded.  

In his last 3 years with the mets, Heilman's ERAs are 3.17*, 3.62, 3.04.  The bad in pressure sitatuions line is just stupid idiotic talk because you REMEMBER the failures far more than the successes.  

Now this year, Im not saying heilman has been to that level.  His ERA is 5.67, and more importnatly, he has more walks already than last year, a WHIP of 1.49, a huge jump.  And he's giving up home runs at a greater clip.  On the other hand, his BABIP is abnormally high (Career its 296, and now its 339) showing the increased hit total is a large part due to luck.  Which suggests at least some normalization down to career stats is likely (he's projected to have an ERA of 4.57 this year, which is still higher than any of the last 3 years, but far better than he's gotten this year).

In other words, Heilmans' likely to at least come down to close to his career stats (or at least in the 4 ERA range) if given the time.  And of course, he's been overworked to hell again this year, which may take its toll and result in the walks.

All evidence suggests the mets should rest him a bit if they can, and then use him as normal, and that he will become effective again.  I'm not saying he's closing material right now, but he's certainly far from as awful as you and other stupid met fans make him sound.  And he's way worth holding onto for this year and beyond.

*The 05 stats include 7 starts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh.  I really really really hate that reasoning gary, cuz it&#8217;s retarded.  </p>
<p>In his last 3 years with the mets, Heilman&#8217;s ERAs are 3.17*, 3.62, 3.04.  The bad in pressure sitatuions line is just stupid idiotic talk because you REMEMBER the failures far more than the successes.  </p>
<p>Now this year, Im not saying heilman has been to that level.  His ERA is 5.67, and more importnatly, he has more walks already than last year, a WHIP of 1.49, a huge jump.  And he&#8217;s giving up home runs at a greater clip.  On the other hand, his BABIP is abnormally high (Career its 296, and now its 339) showing the increased hit total is a large part due to luck.  Which suggests at least some normalization down to career stats is likely (he&#8217;s projected to have an ERA of 4.57 this year, which is still higher than any of the last 3 years, but far better than he&#8217;s gotten this year).</p>
<p>In other words, Heilmans&#8217; likely to at least come down to close to his career stats (or at least in the 4 ERA range) if given the time.  And of course, he&#8217;s been overworked to hell again this year, which may take its toll and result in the walks.</p>
<p>All evidence suggests the mets should rest him a bit if they can, and then use him as normal, and that he will become effective again.  I&#8217;m not saying he&#8217;s closing material right now, but he&#8217;s certainly far from as awful as you and other stupid met fans make him sound.  And he&#8217;s way worth holding onto for this year and beyond.</p>
<p>*The 05 stats include 7 starts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Grund</title>
		<link>http://www.hotfootblog.com/2008/08/05/why-heilman/#comment-1782</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Grund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 03:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotfootblog.com/?p=7041#comment-1782</guid>
		<description>I've been saying this since 2006 now...I can't stand Heilman. He collapses in big spots for one. I've wanted him off this team for god knows how long...He is a liability in this bullpen. The Mets are better off with a guy like Claudio Vargas or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been saying this since 2006 now&#8230;I can&#8217;t stand Heilman. He collapses in big spots for one. I&#8217;ve wanted him off this team for god knows how long&#8230;He is a liability in this bullpen. The Mets are better off with a guy like Claudio Vargas or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
