According to the New York Daily News, federal investigators could have photo evidence that contradicts Roger Clemens’ sworn statements that he was not at a 1998 party at Jose Canseco’s house. The issue of his attendance at said party has come up in both the Mitchell Report and the Feb. 13th hearing in Washington.

“We have reason to believe it’s reliable evidence,” Richard Emery, an attorney for Clemens’ accuser Brian McNamee, told the Daily News on Thursday. “We believe there’s photographic evidence that shows Clemens was at a party he says he wasn’t at.”

Clemens and his attorney are now backpedaling in light of the evidence, saying that Clemens may have been at the party.

And he may have taken performance enhancing drugs.

I have to admit, I am enjoying this after all the animosity Clemens caused during the 2000 season. Karma is a real bitch.