<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mets to Open 2008 on the Road, Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hotfootblog.com/2007/09/11/mets-to-open-2008-on-the-road-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hotfootblog.com/2007/09/11/mets-to-open-2008-on-the-road-again/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: icedrake523</title>
		<link>http://www.hotfootblog.com/2007/09/11/mets-to-open-2008-on-the-road-again/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>icedrake523</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 03:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotfootblog.com/2007/09/11/mets-to-open-2008-on-the-road-again/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>I wonder what this does for our chances of opening the season at home in 2009. Considering how many  season openers we've had on the road, we should get it in 2009. But since the Yankees will open their new stadium too, something tells me they'll get it over us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what this does for our chances of opening the season at home in 2009. Considering how many  season openers we&#8217;ve had on the road, we should get it in 2009. But since the Yankees will open their new stadium too, something tells me they&#8217;ll get it over us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
